WaveSeek All channels

Environment · Channel report

What people complain about in Conservation

WaveSeek read 1,572 public posts about Conservation over 30 days and found 153 genuine complaints in them. Below are the ones that came up most, each linking to the post it was read from.

Measured 17 September 2026 · 7 distinct sources in the last 7 days · this page is rebuilt on every deploy

2,144mentions · 30d
429mentions · 7d
153complaints · 30d
3competitors measured

Daily mentions, 2026-09-03 → 2026-09-17. Peak 128 in a day.

Week over week, mentions moved -17%. A growth figure only appears here when it survives a baseline floor, a source-change check and a credibility ceiling — most channels most weeks show nothing, and that is the honest answer.

The evidence chain

Every complaint below came out of this. Nothing is estimated; each step is a count.

  1. 1,572posts ingested about Conservation30-day window, after excluding 572 news-wire and video posts
  2. 695read by the classifier44% of them
  3. 153were genuine complaints22% of what was read

Mentions here exclude news wires and video titles: somebody reporting on Conservation is not somebody having a problem with it. The Trends screen inside the app counts those too, because it measures attention rather than frustration — which is why the two numbers differ and why this page says which one it is using.

What people actually complain about

The 8 most frequent complaint clusters of 30 found, phrased by the classifier from the posts themselves. The links go to the original post — not to a summary of it.

  1. 1

    Lack of detailed breakdown of yearly identification activity

    2 posts across 1 source · sentiment −0.10

    Show sunburst diagram for IDs on Year in Review — Platform(s) : website URLs (aka web addresses) of any pages, if relevant: https://www.inat…
  2. 2

    Broken map integration causing errors

    2 posts across 1 source · sentiment −0.40

    503 error overlay on google map on taxon page — Both the map on the map tab, and the identification tips tab are overlayed with a 503 error:…
  3. 3

    Incorrect taxonomic identification not correctable

    2 posts across 1 source · sentiment −0.45

    "Inactive Taxon" for Unknowns when in test group "Mobile-Friendly Mode" — Platform : Website App version number , if a mobile app issue: Bro…
  4. 4

    Inconsistent sound recognition amid background noise

    2 posts across 1 source · sentiment −0.15

    I love this app, but sometimes it seems to not hear the bird I'm hearing; sometimes there is background n…
  5. 5

    Mobile app blocking content uploads

    seen once · sentiment −0.40

    iPhone App not allowing uploads — Platform : iPhone App version number , if a mobile app issue: 1.1.1 (231) Browser , if a website issue: UR…
  6. 6

    Missing auto-identification when uploading observations to projects

    seen once · sentiment −0.30

    Adding observation to a Trad. Project - no auto ID as in Upload — After successfully creating a traditional project with a couple of fields…
  7. 7

    Failure to fetch saved locations from cloud storage

    seen once · sentiment −0.50

    Failed to fetch saved locations — Platform : Browser Browser , if a website issue: Google chrome Screenshots of what you are seeing : Descri…
  8. 8

    Duplicate data entry across overlapping citizen-science projects

    seen once · sentiment −0.20

    Projects with a Bioblitz — We have an ongoing (years) collection project for town biodiversity. When we also run a 12 day Bioblitz for the s…

The count is over every post in the cluster. The links are a sample of them, capped at three, and never imply the list is complete.

Who is already there

3 apps measured in this channel from their own recent store reviews. Ratings are computed from the reviews WaveSeek ingested in the window, not read off a store listing.

AppRatingReviews read4★ and up
Merlin Bird ID by Cornell Lab 3.7★ 12 67%
iNaturalist 2.5★ 2 50%
PlantNet 5★ 1 100%

What this page does not tell you

Four competitors in this category print a market size on a page like this one. We do not, because we cannot measure one: mention counts, complaint counts and search volume are not a market size, and a dollar figure built from them would be a guess wearing a decimal point. The same goes for revenue projections, customer demographics and funding comparables.

Everything above is a count of public posts and reviews over a stated window. It is evidence of what people said, not a prediction of what will sell.

See Conservation change

This page is a snapshot. Inside WaveSeek the same channel is live: the complaint list is re-clustered every six hours, competitor ratings are tracked week over week, and saved ideas report what moved since you saved them.

Open WaveSeek

Free covers the measured numbers you just read. The paid tiers cover the interpretation.